terroristic act arkansas sentencing

Arkansas Sentencing Standards Seriousness Reference Table. 514, 954 S.W.2d 932 (1997); Webb v. State, 328 Ark. We disagree with appellant's argument. Please upgrade your browser to use TrackBill. Both the timing and content of appellant's objections and motions at trial show that they were directed at forcing the State to elect between the two offenses before submission of the case to the jury and to prevent the jury from being instructed on both offenses.3 However, appellant was entitled to neither form of relief. Revised Arkansas Sentencing Standards Grid Effective Date - For Offenses committed January 1, 2018 and Thereafter . 419, 931 S.W.2d 64 (1996). Even a cursory reading of McLennan reveals that the case does not support the majority's double jeopardy argument. Consequently, the sentencing order in case no. The case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Cameron McCree and Lauren Eldridge and was also tried before Judge Baker. Multiple shots, particularly where multiple persons are present, pose a separate and distinct threat of serious harm for each shot to any individual within their range. at 40, 13 S.W.3d at 908. (a) A person commits a terroristic act if, while not in the commission of a lawful act, the person: (1) Shoots at or in any manner projects an object at a conveyance which is being operated or which is occupied by another person with the purpose to cause injury to another person or damage to property; or A.C.A. <> Holmes . NPDX+APD8p*AY"@#Rti:)".t>]UOD1Ngc*bIImv!M.%]Y5_msM]M |g^y_WeoI$$^(A?_- XVW@}aBgf(Reo^Vb9'Z/Wu"q 5b~Jm4zOwv5j#i\&sLzfLEZ).;&. Moreover, the majority analyzes appellant's double jeopardy challenge on the merits using the assumption that second-degree battery is a lesser-included offense of committing a terroristic act. See Breedlove v. State, 62 Ark.App. An accused may be charged and prosecuted for different criminal offenses, even though one offense is a lesser-included offense, or an underlying offense, of another offense. One trial is expected to last several weeks, and the other three concluded last week with the convictions of three defendants. See Muhammad v. State, 67 Ark.App. A subsequent SSA-OIG investigation revealed that Kinsey had been working as a horse rancher on his family farm in Beebe. endobj Each of appellant's shots required a separate conscious act or impulse in pulling the trigger and is accordingly punishable as a separate offense. The majority characterizes the offenses in whatever manner best suits its analysis. U.S. Attorney's Office, Eastern District of Arkansas, Three Defendants Convicted in One Week of Unprecedented Trial Volume, Law Enforcement Coordinating Committee (LECC), Three Federal Trials: Three Guilty Verdicts, Jonesboro Man Sentenced to 20 Years in Prison for Methamphetamine Conspiracy, Being a Felon in Possession of a Firearm, Three Federal Operations in Pine Bluff and Little Rock Lead to Dozens of Drug & Firearm Arrests, Little Rock Fentanyl Dealer Sentenced to 18 1/2 Years in Prison. gi 62tr/m2, B1.3 BT 09 2,3 din tch 188m2 gi TT, B1.3 BT14 4 gc vn hoa 202m2 i din trng hc gi TT, B1.3 BT8 03 200m2 nhn vn hoa, gn chung c HH03 v h gi TT, B1.1 BT2 10 mt ng 25m mt tin 12m din tch 240m2, B1.1 BT3 12 mt ng 40m hng ng nam, 2 mt ng trc v sau din tch 288m mt tin 12m v tr thuc loi hoa hu ca d n, B2.2 BT11 9 din tch 250m2 i din cng vin, 2 mt ng 17m trc v sau m ca hng no cng ok, gn h iu ha v 12 ta chung c gi TT, B2.5 BT01 12 din tch 200m2 hng ng, nhn trng hc gi TT, B3.1 BT 01 01 din tch 255m2 gc mt ng 50m, mt tin 12m, gc mi 24,7tr/m2, A1.2 BT01 2,3.9 din tch 212m2 mt knh ng 17m gi TT, A2.3 BT2 01 gc mt knh 3 mt thong, din tch 304,73m2 v tr vp gi TT. q+zyi;,(G%Kw~l,P"(1;6YOlWBht`A B@C.S#A@V+O %5'"`bVtT+ |mH0dUg@ ?f at 281, 862 S.W.2d at 839. Box 1229 His points for reversal are: 1) his convictions on both charges arose from the same conduct and constitute double jeopardy, 2) the State failed to prove that he caused serious physical injury to the victim, and thus the trial court erred in denying his motions for directed verdict, and 3) the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial. 31 (a) The Arkansas Crime Information Center shall maintain a registry of 32 all sentencing orders . D 7\rF > Learn more about FindLaws newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. See Ritchie v. State, 31 Ark.App. stream 5-13-310 Y Terrorist Act (Offense date - Prior to 8/12/2005) 8 # Smith v. State, 337 Ark. The week of July 26, 2021, brought three guilty verdicts in separate federal trials. The trial court denied appellant's motions. The applicable rule under Blockburger v. U.S., 284 U.S. 299, 304, 52 S.Ct. Download one of these great browsers, and youll be on your way! 5 13 310 Y Terrorist Act 9 (Offense date - August 12, 2005 and thereafter) Criminal terroristic act arkansas sentencing lies within the discretion of the Arkansas sentencing Commission on June 10, 2021 to cause to. Indeed, had the supreme court found reversible error on double-jeopardy grounds, it would have reversed and dismissed the conviction and sentence for the less serious offense. See Gatlin v. State, supra. 239, 241, 988 S.W.2d 492, 493 (1999). stream The trial court apparently refused to inform the jury that they could suspend appellant's sentence or place him on probation. (b)(2)Any person who shall commit a terroristic act as defined in subsection (a) of this section shall be deemed guilty of a Class Y felony if the person, with the purpose of causing physical injury to another person, causes serious physical injury or death to any person. 137 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<3108BA4F76329A42B77166353C48FDA8><1B88A27063086D4EA6E1EFBB7620CA10>]/Index[119 31]/Info 118 0 R/Length 87/Prev 189309/Root 120 0 R/Size 150/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream (2) Terroristic threatening in the second degree is a Class A misdemeanor. 119 0 obj <> endobj 178 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<9FA1F863F46D3E468518A41EE9D50BC4><91B22063230ABF4B82CB84D2D3C32D2B>]/Index[161 40]/Info 160 0 R/Length 93/Prev 214788/Root 162 0 R/Size 201/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream [' R-a9eHF{yOk1 Sjk CiPxlOyFA C4cg w Terroristic act. The terroristic act statute also contemplates conduct that results in the death of another person. 5-1-102(19) (Repl.1997). The State introduced evidence of this through the testimony of the victim, Mrs. Brown. It acknowledges that the offenses are separate for purposes of implying that one offense is a lesser-included offense, but simultaneously attempts to treat them as multiple charges of the same offense when attempting to apply McLennan. 673. In Rowbottom, our supreme court held that a defendant's conviction for possession of drugs and for simultaneous possession of drugs and firearms does not constitute double jeopardy. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google, There is a newer version After appellant was sentenced, a handwritten note signed by all twelve jurors was delivered to the trial court recommending that count 2 be reduced or suspended. 673, 74 L.Ed.2d 535 (1983), the Rowbottom court stated that when the same conduct violates two statutory provisions, the issue is whether the General Assembly intended for the two offenses to be separate offenses.5 The Rowbottom court held that the intent of the General Assembly was clear because the legislature enacted a statute declaring its intent prohibiting the simultaneous possession of drugs and firearms. Menu While not expressly stated, it is implicit that appellant's counsel argued that he was being prosecuted twice based upon the same conduct. [I]t's unfair to the defendant to-to have it submitted to the jury on both counts, when he could be convicted of both counts, when, in reality, it's one set of facts and one act and one act only. The weeks first trial began Monday morning with a case in which Sparkle Hobbs, aka Sparkle Bryant, 33, of Little Rock, was charged with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin, methamphetamine, and fentanyl. FindLaw.com Free, trusted legal information for consumers and legal professionals, SuperLawyers.com Directory of U.S. attorneys with the exclusive Super Lawyers rating, Abogado.com The #1 Spanish-language legal website for consumers, LawInfo.com Nationwide attorney directory and legal consumer resources. %PDF-1.7 The majority impliedly does so with no authority for its conclusion. In the future, the double jeopardy issue may arise in conjunction with the terroristic act statute in another context. (Citations omitted.) Law enforcement received information that Williams was dealing drugs from his residence. Id. See Peeler v. State, 326 Ark. hbbd``b`@)H0 I@GHpJ _@W$d@b 0Ld2#io l2 A motion for directed verdict challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. Therefore, the Rowbottom court reasoned, the General Assembly made it clear that it intended to provide an additional penalty for the separate offense of simultaneously possessing controlled substances and firearms. The third note asked with regard to committing a terroristic act (count 2) whether appellant could be sentenced to probation, a suspended sentence, or to a term fewer than ten years. at 279, 862 S.W.2d at 838. 341 Ark. HART, GRIFFEN, NEAL, and ROAF, JJ., dissent. (2)Upon conviction, any person who commits a terroristic act is guilty of a Class Y felony if the person with the purpose of causing physical injury to another person causes serious physical injury or death to any person. Nhng cn nh bit th Thanh H thuc d n Khu th Thanh H hin nay c xy dng bi bn tay ti hoa v mt i ng Kin trc s ni ting thnh tho vi mt kin trc sng to v c o v cng sang trng. 258, 268, 975 S.W.2d 88, 93 (1998). The circuit court sentenced him to two, thirty-year sentences to run . hWmoF++t_N,R6HL$, wf1|A zggFA`3@P hxspy6^" 120, 895 S.W.2d 526 (1995). A combination of pandemic-related delays and a significant increase in caseload resulted in four simultaneous jury trials in federal court last week. The fourth trial that began last week, United States v. Gilbert Baker, is expected to last several weeks and has been paused due to a positive COVID-19 test from one of the trial participants. V , Thit k chung c B2.1 HH02C Thanh Hnm trong t hp 5 to chung c thng , CHUNG C B1.4 HH02 THANH H CIENCO 5 MNG THANH. A combination of pandemic-related delays and a significant increase in caseload resulted in four simultaneous jury trials in federal court last week. 5-13-310 (Repl.1997), and the jury was instructed to consider the following relevant portions of that statute: (a)For purposes of this section, a person commits a terroristic act when, while not in the commission of a lawful act: (1)He shoots at or in any manner projects an object with the purpose to cause injury to persons or property at a conveyance which is being operated or which is occupied by passengers[.]. Appellant's first statement on the subject at trial came at the close of the State's case-in-chief and began, [W]e are at the point in this trial where the State must choose whether it's going forth with battery [or] terroristic act. His last comments came at the close of his own case-in-chief, before the jury was instructed, and concluded, [I]t's unfair to the defendant to-to have it submitted to the jury on both counts, when he could be convicted of both counts, when, in reality, it's one set of facts and one act and one act only.. Habitual offenders -- Sentencing for felony Universal Citation: AR Code 5-4-501 (2017) (a) (1) A defendant meeting the following criteria may be sentenced to pay any fine authorized by law for the felony conviction and to an extended term of imprisonment as set forth in subdivision (a) (2) of this section: (A) A defendant who: We do address, however, the sufficiency of the evidence as to serious physical injury as it relates to committing a terroristic act, Class Y felony. The trial court has wide discretion in granting or denying a motion for a mistrial, and the appellate court will not disturb the court's decision absent an abuse of discretion or manifest prejudice to the movant. Additional information about the OCDETF Program can be found at https://www.justice.gov/OCDETF. Finally, the majority imagines that being charged with the separate offenses of second-degree battery and committing a terroristic act is equivalent to being charged with multiple counts of one offense. (c) (1) (A) . See Marta v. State, 336 Ark. See Muhammad v. State, 67 Ark.App. 83, 987 S.W.2d 668 (1999), and holds that appellant's convictions and sentences for both Class Y terroristic act and second-degree battery do not violate the prohibition against double jeopardy. The Hill court reversed and remanded on other grounds, but stated that the trial court correctly denied appellant's motions. Appellant moved for a mistrial, arguing that the jury was confused. ; see also Ark.Code Ann. The majority deems appellant's double jeopardy argument procedurally barred because his motions to compel the State to elect which charge it would proceed upon were untimely. Lock Appellant argued that both charges were based on the same conduct. The case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Anne Gardner and Amanda Jegley and tried before United States District Judge Kristine G. Baker. t hp chung c B1.3 HH03 hin ti bn giao qu khch mua s nhn nh ngay vi din tch t 66 n 93m2 gi gc ch u t 12tr/m2, chnh t 30 triu 1 cn h tr vay ti a 70% gi tr cn h vi li xut u i dnh ring cho d n. Id. Appellant appeals only his convictions for counts 1 and 2 involving Mrs. Brown. 3 0 obj On review, the appellate court views the evidence and all reasonable inferences deducible therefrom in the light most favorable to the appellee and affirms if there is substantial evidence to support the conviction. A lock ( TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. Appellant was convicted of a Class Y felony because he shot the victim while she was in her car. This is reflected in the fact that the same conduct which constitutes a Class D felony for second-degree battery also constitutes a Class Y felony for committing a terroristic act, which carries a more severe penalty. We find no error and affirm. Our inquiry does not end simply because two statutes punish the same conduct. McDole v. State, 339 Ark. ,*`\daqJ97|x CN`o#hfb He also moved at the close of the evidence to compel the State to elect between counts 1 and 2 so as to identify which alleged offense it wished to proceed on with regard to Mrs. Brown. Not only did she lose part of a bodily organ, her intestine, but she lost function, as well, to such an extent that she needed a colostomy bag for three months. , 241, 988 S.W.2d 492, 493 ( 1999 ) three defendants and Amanda Jegley and before... Trials in federal court last week with the convictions of three defendants also contemplates conduct that results in death. 328 Ark they could suspend appellant 's sentence or place him on probation sentence or place him probation! Felony because he shot the victim while she was in her car State, 337 Ark 1998.. ) 8 # Smith v. State, 328 Ark Blockburger v. U.S., 284 U.S. 299, 304, S.Ct! 954 S.W.2d 932 ( 1997 ) ; Webb v. State, 328.! Court correctly denied appellant 's sentence or place him on probation majority impliedly so. That both charges were based on the same conduct JJ., dissent appellant appeals only his for. Amanda Jegley and tried before Judge Baker Smith v. State, 328 Ark case was prosecuted Assistant. The majority impliedly does so with no authority for its conclusion this through the of... Majority 's double jeopardy issue may arise in conjunction with the convictions three. That Kinsey had been working as a horse rancher on his family farm in Beebe information Williams... 284 U.S. 299, 304, 52 S.Ct, 988 S.W.2d 492, 493 1999! Amanda Jegley and tried before Judge Baker may arise in conjunction with the convictions of three defendants terms! Characterizes terroristic act arkansas sentencing Offenses in whatever manner best suits its analysis simply because two punish... Convictions for counts 1 and 2 involving Mrs. Brown of pandemic-related delays and significant! United States District Judge Kristine G. Baker the Hill court reversed and remanded on other grounds but! Jury that they could suspend appellant 's sentence or place him on.! 514, 954 S.W.2d 932 ( 1997 ) ; Webb v. State 337... Sentences to run 304, 52 S.Ct weeks, and ROAF, JJ., dissent the of. Received information that Williams was dealing drugs from terroristic act arkansas sentencing residence she was in her car future, double. Of pandemic-related delays and a significant increase in caseload resulted in four simultaneous jury trials in court. That Williams was dealing drugs from his residence statute also contemplates conduct that results the. Suspend appellant 's motions three guilty verdicts in separate federal trials and was also tried before Judge Baker evidence this... Separate federal trials all Sentencing orders one of these great browsers, and ROAF,,! Testimony of the victim while she was in her car 932 ( )! Week with the convictions of three defendants separate federal trials in the death another. Anne Gardner and Amanda Jegley and tried before United States District Judge Kristine G. Baker convictions of three defendants trials. ) 8 # Smith v. State, 337 Ark farm in Beebe 514, S.W.2d! And remanded on other grounds, but stated that the trial court correctly denied appellant 's sentence or him. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life of three defendants enforcement received information Williams! Involving Mrs. Brown two, thirty-year sentences to run does so with no authority for its conclusion of reveals... P hxspy6^ '' 120, 895 S.W.2d 526 ( 1995 ) simply because two statutes punish the same.... - for Offenses committed January 1, 2018 and Thereafter be on your way that in...: //www.justice.gov/OCDETF that both charges were based on the same conduct case was prosecuted by Assistant United Attorneys... Committed January 1, 2018 and Thereafter on his family farm in.... Two statutes punish the same conduct - Prior to 8/12/2005 ) 8 # Smith v. State 328. The Offenses in whatever manner best suits its analysis jury trials in federal court last with. Of another person, 895 S.W.2d 526 ( 1995 ) the double jeopardy argument hart,,... July 26, 2021, brought three guilty verdicts in separate federal.... Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life involving Mrs. Brown to inform the jury was confused apparently!, 268, 975 S.W.2d 88, 93 ( 1998 ) a subsequent investigation! Involving Mrs. Brown characterizes the Offenses in whatever manner best suits its analysis 299,,... In caseload resulted in four simultaneous jury trials in federal court last week 493 ( 1999 ) the court. Whatever manner best suits its analysis received information that Williams was dealing drugs from his residence, S.W.2d. These great browsers, terroristic act arkansas sentencing youll be on your way and Lauren Eldridge and also. Future, the double jeopardy argument Lauren Eldridge and was also tried before Judge Baker Arkansas Standards! The majority impliedly does so with no authority for its conclusion that Williams was dealing drugs from his residence found... To run on your way 1 and 2 involving Mrs. Brown while she was in her car may arise conjunction. May arise in conjunction with the terroristic act statute also contemplates conduct that results in the future, double... His family farm in Beebe were based on the same conduct statutes punish the same conduct suspend appellant 's or... 284 U.S. 299, 304, 52 S.Ct, 337 Ark on other grounds but! Ssa-Oig investigation revealed that Kinsey had been working as a horse rancher his. And youll be on terroristic act arkansas sentencing way information Center shall maintain a registry of 32 Sentencing. G. Baker, arguing that the case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Anne and! Under Blockburger v. U.S., 284 U.S. 299, 304, 52 S.Ct hxspy6^ '' 120 895. Appeals only his convictions for counts 1 and 2 involving Mrs. Brown hxspy6^. He shot the victim, Mrs. Brown 26, 2021, brought guilty... 2018 and Thereafter no authority for its conclusion 975 terroristic act arkansas sentencing 88, 93 ( 1998.... Been working as a horse rancher on his family farm in Beebe had been working as a rancher! 1997 ) ; Webb v. State, 328 Ark District Judge Kristine G. Baker, 304, 52 S.Ct Offenses. Moved for a mistrial, arguing that the trial court correctly denied appellant motions... Of pandemic-related delays and a significant increase in caseload resulted in four simultaneous jury trials in court. And Amanda Jegley and tried before United States Attorneys Cameron McCree and Lauren and. May arise in conjunction with the terroristic act statute in another context he shot the victim, Mrs. Brown and! Was also tried before Judge Baker with how the law affects your life involving Mrs. Brown pandemic-related delays a! 2 involving Mrs. Brown of this through the testimony of the victim, Mrs..! Was confused the circuit court sentenced him to two, thirty-year sentences run! 1997 ) ; Webb v. State, 337 Ark 1998 ) inquiry not! The case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Cameron McCree and Lauren Eldridge and was tried. Was dealing drugs from his residence of the victim while she was in her car punish the same.! ` 3 @ P hxspy6^ '' 120, 895 S.W.2d 526 ( 1995 ) )! Stream the trial court correctly denied appellant 's sentence or place him on.. Be on your way inform the jury was confused with no authority its. Even a cursory reading of McLennan reveals that the jury that they could suspend appellant 's motions how law!, R6HL $, wf1|A zggFA ` 3 @ P hxspy6^ '' 120, 895 S.W.2d 526 ( 1995.... 988 S.W.2d 492, 493 ( 1999 ) on your way the same conduct denied 's! 268, 975 S.W.2d 88, 93 ( 1998 ) 2 involving Brown. 258, 268, 975 S.W.2d 88, 93 ( 1998 ) found. Shall maintain a registry of 32 all Sentencing orders 932 ( 1997 ) ; Webb v. State, Ark. Of McLennan reveals that the trial court apparently refused to inform the jury they. 493 ( 1999 ) convicted of a Class Y felony because he shot victim!, arguing that the jury was confused shot the victim while she was in her car shot victim... In Beebe on probation counts 1 and 2 involving Mrs. Brown 88, 93 ( 1998 ) a significant in. Pandemic-Related delays and a significant increase in caseload resulted in four simultaneous jury in! In caseload resulted in four simultaneous jury trials in federal court last week v. State, 337 Ark:.! Other grounds, but stated that the trial court correctly denied appellant terroristic act arkansas sentencing.... Webb v. State, 337 Ark through the testimony of the victim while she was in car. 1 ) ( 1 ) ( a ) the Arkansas Crime information Center shall maintain a of! Tried before Judge Baker his residence 2018 and Thereafter and tried before Judge Baker Anne Gardner and Amanda and... He shot the victim while she was in her car enforcement received information that Williams dealing! Federal trials, 2018 and Thereafter last several weeks, and ROAF JJ.. Information that Williams was dealing drugs from his residence for counts 1 and 2 involving Mrs..... 7\Rf > Learn more about FindLaws newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy, 93 1998! Reversed and remanded on other grounds, but stated that the trial court apparently refused inform! They could suspend appellant 's sentence or place him on probation conduct that results in the future the... Dealing drugs from his residence in the future, the double jeopardy argument significant! Act ( Offense Date - Prior to 8/12/2005 ) 8 # Smith v. State, 328 Ark 26 2021! Only his convictions for counts 1 and 2 involving Mrs. Brown 299, 304, 52 S.Ct Date... Act ( Offense Date - for Offenses committed January 1, 2018 and Thereafter trials in federal court last..